Something Fishy in the Scottish Polls

There are two full days remaining before polls open over Scotland in a referendum that will determine whether Scotland, after 307 years of London rule, will remain with or leave the United Kingdom. Over the weekend the British state broadcaster, the BBC, highlighted the rather dubious, and embarrassingly anachronistic, support for the Better Together pro-Union campaign offered by the intensely sectarian Orange Order in its parade through the streets of Edinburgh. Yet on the other side of Scotland, in Glasgow, tens of thousands of Yes supporters crowded the streets in celebration of their anticipated referendum victory on Thursday, and not a single mention was made of it by the BBC. Over the latter stages of the campaign the BBC have been found to remove Yes supporters from the background of its ‘special reports’ and Photoshop ‘No’ signs where there were none. Under increasing pressure from the people of Scotland, and from the official complaints of Alex Salmond, the First Minister, it has been forced to acknowledge that its coverage has been atrocious. It is now far beyond doubt that the BBC is acting in a manner more fitting a totalitarian régime than the broadcaster of a western liberal democracy. From the outside of Scotland looking in, it is clear that the people of Scotland are being subjected to a powerful campaign of lies and deception, that aims, through fear mongering and blackmail, to turn the tide in the swing to Yes across Scotland that has become a true revolution.

It now becomes clear to the outside observer that even the polls conducted by the Unionist campaign ought to be treated with suspicion. Ever since the YouGov poll, considered to be the most hostile towards Scottish self-determination, published its results last week putting the Yes side at 51% it has been noted that the nature of pro-Union polling has radically altered. Now the ‘undecided vote’ is excluded from the calculations as a rule; a section of the electorate who have consistently shown to edge towards a Yes vote at a ratio of two to one, and the polling samples have shrunk to less than a thousand people. These measures do nothing but distort the opinion of the nation as a whole, and leads to the conclusion that more sinister dirty tricks are being played by those in power. In the week after the shock YouGov result a number of other, re-calibrated, polls were published in a clear attempt to correct the boon to the Yes campaign. Better Together’s Survation survey put No at 54%, the Observer’s Opinium had No at 53%, and the Sunday Times’ Panelbase survey placed No at 51%. It was the Telegraph’s ICM poll that put the fly in the ointment. In spite of the paper’s relentless attack on the idea of Scottish independence its own poll, of only 705 people, found Yes support to be at a whopping 54% – excluding undecided voters. Every effort is being made to stem the flow of Scottish voters to the Yes side, efforts that have not baulked at outright lies. What is becoming increasingly clear is the fact that the larger the poll samples are the larger the Yes support. In less than two weeks, correcting for very obvious government and media manipulation, there has been a groundswell in favour of independence in Scotland. Adding the undecided votes on the 18th it is not altogether unlikely that the Yes vote may indeed reach 60% and over.

Comments

  1. YES will storm the independence vote with at least 65% according to the online polls that I’ve been party to. 120,000 participants in a poll should give a very good indication!

    Liked by 5 people

    • Hack Journalist says:

      John Swapp – It certainly does look as though the Scottish Yes Campaign is doing significantly better than the heavily controlled British media is prepared to let on. We predict a convincing Yes victory. Remember, you heard it from Dublin first.

      Liked by 5 people

    • But the online polls are primarily younger people, there is def an age gap with the vote

      Liked by 1 person

    • Hack Journalist says:

      Caz – Yes, the online poll responders are primarily younger people, but this does not lead to the conclusion that there is a gap in the voting patterns with age. It must be remembered that the older voters are the ones who fought the Poll Tax and weathered Hurricane Thatcher.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Catherine Kerr says:

      Oh, I hope and pray this is true. As a Scot based in Dubai, I do not have the vote, but fingers crossed- we free ourselves from Westminster

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Walter Burt says:

    Thank you for an excellent unbiased look at what is happening here in Scotland.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Hack Journalist says:

      Walter Burt – Thank you for such a nice compliment. If it is any use to you good folk over on the other island, the more we look at the media outside of Britain the more we see the immense control of the British government over the media. It looks clear that the vote will strongly favour independence. So, I hope you will allow the Irish to be the first to welcome you to the community of free nations.

      Liked by 12 people

    • Here here, Ireland has been a a happy hunting group for unbias press reports and economists. If that is how a free country works, I want some of that!

      Well done Emerald News and the likes of David McWilliams, we the yes vote are over joyed to see some of the truths get out against this over powering machine of hatred and bile.

      The great danager of all this hatred and drivel fired at Scotland by Westminster is the back lash that may happen, especially in the event of a no vote!

      Liked by 3 people

  3. I am everyone I know has never been asked in a poll if we’re voting yes or no. 90% of people I know are voting yes.

    Liked by 5 people

    • Hack Journalist says:

      One thing that we must all bear in mind Norman is that polls are rarely conducted by impartial bodies. The bias of the pollster shows through in the demographics of the poll sample they chose. In Scotland this appears to be the ‘same old’ polling samples of the east of the country and the middle class. No account has been taken of the 1.5 million extra voters who have registered to vote in this referendum and have never been polled.

      Liked by 1 person

    • william mccaughey says:

      i have seen polls from 75% to 84% for a yes vote. where they are getting the results being presented on tv must be from the tory backbenchers

      Like

    • Doreen Taylor says:

      That was my estimation too, judging by social media polls, the true grass-roots opinion of the referendum. I was expecting a yes victory of around 70-80%. I am with you all.

      Like

  4. “Over the latter stages of the campaign the BBC have been found to remove Yes supporters from the background of its ‘special reports’ and Photoshop ‘No’ signs where there were none. Under increasing pressure from the people of Scotland, and from the official complaints of Alex Salmond, the First Minister, it has been forced to acknowledge that its coverage has been atrocious.”
    Do you have more details on this. Is there evidence of photoshopping and removals? When and how did the BBC admit that its coverage has been atrocious?
    I made a complaint on their website and their response was that they had been impartial

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hack Journalist says:

      LindsayO – Yes, we will make sure that more details are posted in the editorial on this issue.

      Like

    • i don’t think the bbc have ever admitted their coverage was atrocious and i think the photoshop story is ruibbish. that’s not to say i don’t thimk there has been bias and i too complained and received the standard “we are impartial” reply.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Hack Journalist says:

      Jeff – Thank you for your comment. A number of BBC employees and insiders have complained of the poor coverage, the biased reporting and the official gagging orders issued to senior staffers. Continual leaks from within the BBC have themselves been the sources to much of the information being used by Yes Scotland and the National Party. You may indeed think that the Photoshop incident was rubbish, but we present it here in good faith. Going on many other documented reports of Yes supporters being edged out of view, we can only conclude that it is most likely that the BBC have used Photoshop to ensure their directives.

      Like

  5. Rab McKnight says:

    Could you give sources of photoshop-ing please. Proof is better than anonymous accusation.
    We pretty much all know the beeb is biased, proof would help.
    It was said in one tv discussion that the Survation poll only used landline phones for polling. Poorer people, like myself, don’t have landlines because mobile deals are cheaper. Young people are unlikely to have landlines, I’d suggest.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Reblogged this on Are We Really Better Together? and commented:
    In less than two weeks, correcting for very obvious government and media manipulation, there has been a groundswell in favour of independence in Scotland. Adding the undecided votes on the 18th it is not altogether unlikely that the Yes vote may indeed reach 60% and over.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Sharon Stoker says:

    I truly wish I understood the hostile,hateful feelings surfacing since this became an issue (Scottish Independence). I have many Scottish friends and Families who live in England and many who live in Scotland,like me they are baffled and anxious about how this will impact their lives.I love Scotland and have enjoyed visiting friends and family often.I have lived in the US for the last 10 + years…so not sure if I am missing a piece of the jigsaw puzzle?? I love Britain…always have…more so now that I have been away and thought us a united nation.It saddens me …everything I am seeing in social media and in the news online the hostility,anger and vigour with which some people are approaching this.I guess it feels much like a divorce…which is always such a destructful state of affairs. Guess I am a lover of harmony and figuring out problems in general. Sad in the States and wondering what I will come home to.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hack Journalist says:

      Sharon Stoker – Thank you for your thoughtful response. From Ireland, a close neighbour of Scotland as you know, we do not see much evidence of anger or hatred. In fact the entire debate has been conducted with remarkable civility, and this has been remarked upon by many international press observers. What you may be picking up on are the airings of valid grievances that have been silenced by the British government for decades. Britain is Europe’s most unequal society, and Scotland has suffered greatly from the poverty of that imbalance. Were you aware that one in five children in Scotland are below the breadline, and that food banks are increasingly reporting incidences of malnutrition in Scotland? People are rightly upset by this, but there is no sign that the debate within Scotland has become in any way aggressive. We suspect that the BBC may want you to believe this, but it is not the reality on the ground.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Do not be afraid to come here. Passions run high and some folks at the edges of both sides act and say vile and horrible things, but they really are exceptional. The unionists and their supporters are either doing ok personally so don’t want anything to change that, or happy to keep the control of all 4 countries taxes to gamble with in London, and unfortunately retain the empire mentality, not accepting that the world has moved on. The YES campaign is a groundswell movement of over 400 different groups who have researched the “facts” reported by the Better Together side and broadcast the truth of their lies and deceit through social media and recently set up news media. They have done this precisely because of the bias. If you check weebluebook.com , wingsoverscotland.com, newsnet scotland, you will get more info. We have no problem with English or any other people, and we will not be putting up borders. This is just more disingenuous misinformation spread by unionists. We have the opportunity to redistribute the wealth of our country a cross all its citizens. We must take it. Food banks in a country so rich as ours is an affront to humanity. Most Scots are not selfish and money is not their king. Unfairness and patronising platitudes really get us going. We must get independence from Westminster before more harm is done to us. 🙂

      Liked by 2 people

    • Sharon….the debate and interest levels have been amazing. This is democracy at its very best. Sure you get some nasty stuff online from both sides from cowards with keyboards but lets not let that spoil the festival of democracy which is going on here. Whatever the outcome this has been brilliant!

      Like

    • If you look at Facebook you will see people singing thousands of people Dancing in George square and writing songs telling jokes, there is very little aggression again the papers making it sound so they are even saying in the papers the police are training polling staff in case there is a bomb scare, they are putting idea into people head we never have bon scares. So you will be fine when you visit Scotland or England

      Liked by 1 person

    • Brian Mckenna says:

      Sharon maybe I have just been lucky but all I have witnessed r.e negativity is some people shouting out of a car window at us while we manned a Yes stall .I have many English friends and all of them are saying go for it .There will always be a percentage of Idiots .

      Liked by 1 person

    • Scottish, English, Welsh and Northern Irish are all completely different identities. Scotland asked to unify with England, it was through debt and desperation, no Welshman ever signed the act of Union. I believe that independence is a right that unfortunately neither the Scots or Welsh are quite ready for… But as for devolution (which has proved successful) the ideas have been sown and now is the time for concrete plans to come into force. We are both tiny countries, let those plans count. Cymru an Byth. Addaw teg a wna ynfyd yn llawen! Is e ‘n t-ionnsachadh òg an t-ionnsachadh bòidheach!

      Like

    • Hack Journalist says:

      WelshRob – I do hope that you are able to see the logical inconsistency in what you have written. You speak of independence as a ‘right’ and then claim that it is a thing for which neither Scotland nor Wales are ready. Either self-determination is a right – like education and security – or it is not. The argument that because a nation is “tiny” it must be ruled by a slightly bigger one is perhaps just a little bit (read: ‘outrageously’) absurd. Thanks for your comment.

      Like

  8. Reblogged this on chunkyfunkymunky.

    Like

  9. It has become increasingly obvious to the “yes “Scots ,that the English based newspapers and more importantly the BBC have indeed been heavily biased on there reporting of the “No Thanks”campaign! It is also obvious that the politicians in London,in all three main parties are in fear of something,could it be there cushy jobs?It has been very difficult to find an un-biased and truthful report on the Referendum. There hasn’t been any direct answers from either side,its all been flannel,like they all have something that they aren’t telling us. I fear that the biased reporting will turn a lot of undecided into “No’s. I would bet on at least 1 recount if its close,and wouldn’t put it past them to have some sort of fix on it. I welcome your unbiased reporting of the referendum and wished there had been a lot more “real”information to base my decision on?

    Liked by 1 person

    • There will be no recount, locally they can do a recount but nationaly there will be NO recount, for me the only way a NO vote will win is with underhand tactics, lets face it if the UK government were willing to invade countries and people on all sides die based on a lie of WMDs when it was realy for oil, then why would they let us go peacefully off into the night?? I am predicting a minimum of 60-40 in favour of YES, this is our time!!

      Liked by 2 people

    • We have been told that there will be no recount, whatever the result. Make of that what you will. There is widespread unease in Scotland that the result may be ‘fixed’.

      Liked by 2 people

  10. We know ALL about the MSM bias over here. What’s winning the campaign for the Yes side is Social Media such as Facebook and Twitter, we’re going to make Mark Zuckerberg our second patron saint!!

    Liked by 3 people

  11. Reblogged this on Adelaide Blue Haggis Bistro.

    Liked by 1 person

  12. Reblogged this on raggededgehouse and commented:
    YES YES YES

    Liked by 1 person

  13. Tommy Girders Brawley says:

    I recon all Scottish bbc Licence payers should chuck in a tenner each ! Use the money to higher the best lawyer we can get take them to the Eu courts and get back all of our licence fee’s that we have paid to this corupt corporation who have broken every rule in the book concerning the Scottish referendum !

    Liked by 4 people

  14. It’s true impartial in the sense that yes and no camp get same air time ….but it’s the content of that air time that is biased ..they use smoke and mirrors to try and fool poeple …unsuccessfully ….they also back the no campaign through supposed expert opinions heavily backing no ..ie bankers ..we know what we think of them ….big buisnesses ..Many of them donating to the Tories ..al speaking to the poeple of Scotland via 10 Downing Street ….it has been a fortnight of scare ..threat ..doom and gloom …yet we know Scotland is the wealthiest part of the uk …. We can stand in the world that’s not in doubt …so you have to ask what the real reasons are ? why these actions of bullying from our larger neighbour are all really about …..We need to and want to rid ourselves of Westminster control ..it will happen ..it must happen

    Liked by 1 person

  15. The powers that be will want to keep their jewel….. thats the whole reason they are putting it at 50/50 so they can tweek the votes if needed….. a landslide however negates this option and fear of loosing their jewel has lead them to make mistakes… they have took the people of Scotland for fools with their panic propaganda bringing the full might of the BBC bias machine to bear on those people….. the people of Scotland are no fools and they can smell a rat…..you are only better together if you are “All in it together” they are in it together but we only have ourselves to make a stand….

    Liked by 2 people

  16. for those of you who are looking for evidence of BBC photoshopping and other criminal bias have a look at the Dirty Dozen.
    http://newsnetscotland.com/index.php/affairs-scotland/9719-the-dirty-dozen-the-case-against-bbc-scotland

    Liked by 1 person

  17. Thank you for such an unbiased fair account. What the scots people have been privy to is a harshly controlled government and media bias. Using scare tactics, editing and lies to quarry favour. We are not making it up, we are not paranoid it’s simply the totalitarian thinking of a well oiled machine. Thank you again

    Liked by 2 people

  18. I hope so, but I’m not convinced. I still see quite a few No votes in my circle and quite a few people staying silent. It’s very difficult to measure.

    Liked by 1 person

  19. One thing that has really annoyed me is Sky News constantly having the poll results on their news 24/7 top left of the screen, really if that ain’t to influence votes on the No side…then I don’t know what is.

    I have always been skeptical of the polls conducted by these so called research companies, with the advancement of technology surely they can release a poll online in which only Scottish people with Scottish postcodes and one IP address can vote.

    I have to say..noscotland.net currently have a poll on-going to which they have asked “Should Scotland Leave The United Kingdom?”, despite the results being great at 91.78 Yes to 8.13 for No..based on 182,000+ votes. However, I can assume anyone with internet access regardless of country may be allowed to vote.

    Also why did The Daily Record conducted their own online poll on their website with over 20,000+ votes to find out a couple of hours later they took the poll down due to 72% in favour of a yes vote. The screenshot is currently doing the rounds on social media.

    The only poll (pole) we can trust at the moment is the one to hang your washing out on, Thursdays poll will be the true reflection in the hope for a landslide victory.

    Liked by 1 person

  20. Bruce Williamson says:

    From Nthony Well’s uk polling report website:

    1) The polls are ALL wrong, the real position is obviously X

    Er… based on what? The reality is that opinion polling is pretty much the only way of measuring public opinion. We have some straws in the wind from mid-term elections, but they tend to be low turnout protest votes, don’t tend to predict general election results and are anyway quite a long time ago now. Equally a few people point to local government by-elections, but when compared to general election results these normally grossly overestimate Liberal Democrat support. If you think the polls are wrong just because they “feel” wrong to you, it probably says more about what you would like the result to be than anything about the polls.

    2) I speak to lots of people and none of them will vote for X!

    Actually, so do pollsters, and unless you regularly travel around the whole country and talk to an exceptionally representative demographic spread of people, they do it better than you do. We all have a tendency to be friends with people with similar beliefs and backgrounds, so it is no surprise that many people will have a social circle with largely homogenous political views. Even if you talk to a lot of strangers about politics, you yourself are probably exerting an interviewer effect in the way you ask.

    3) How come I’ve never been invited to take part?

    There are about 40 million adults in the UK. Each opinion poll involves about 1,000 people. If you are talking about political voting intention polls, then probably under 100 are conducted by phone each year. You can do the sums – if there are 40,000,000 adults in the UK and 100,000 are interviewed for a political opinion poll then on average you will be interviewed once every 400 years. It may be a long wait.

    4) They only interview 1000 people, you’d need to interview millions of people to make it accurate!

    George Gallup used to use a marvellous analogy when people raised this point: you don’t need to eat a whole bowl of soup to tell if it is too salty, providing it is sufficently stirred a single spoonful will suffice. The same applies to polls, providing an opinion poll accurately reflects the whole electorate (e.g, it has the right balance of male and female, the right age distribution, the right income distribution, people from the different regions of Britain in the correct proportions and so on) it will also accurately reflect their opinion.

    In the 1930s in the USA the Literary Digest used to do mail-in polls that really did survey millions of people, literally millions. In 1936 they sent surveys to a quarter of the entire electorate and received 2 million replies. They confidently predicted that Alf Landon would win the imminent US Presidential election with 57% of the popular vote and 370 electoral votes. George Gallup meanwhile used quota sampling to interview just a few thousand people and predicted that Landon would lose miserably to Roosevelt. In reality, Roosevelt beat Landon in a landslide, winning 61% of the vote and 523 electoral votes. Gallup was right, the Digest was wrong.

    As long as it is sufficent to dampen down sample error, it isn’t the number of people that were interviewed that matters, it is how representative of the population they are. The Literary Digest interviewed millions, but they were mainly affluent people so their poll wasn’t representative. Gallup interviewed only a few thousand, but his small poll was representative, so he got it right.

    5) Polls give the answer the people paying for it want

    The answers that most clients are interested in are the truth – polls are very expensive, if you just wanted someone to tell you what you wanted to hear there are far cheaper sources of sycophancy. The overwhelming majority of polling is private commercial polling, not stuff for newspapers, and here clients want the truth, warts and all. Polling companies do political polling for the publicity, there is comparatively little money in it. They want to show off their accuracy to impress big money clients, so it would be downright foolish for them to sacrifice their chances with the clients from whom they make the real money to satisfy the whims of clients who don’t really pay much (not to mention that most pollsters value their own professional integrity too much!).

    6) Pollsters only ask the people who they know will give them the answer they want

    Responses to polls on newspaper websites and forums sometimes contain bizarre statements to the effect that all the interviews must have been done in London, the Guardian’s newsroom, Conservative Central Office etc. They aren’t, polls are sampled so they have the correct proportion of people from each region of Britain. You don’t have to trust the pollsters on this – the full tables of the polls will normally have breakdowns by demographics including region, so you can see just how many people in Scotland, Wales, the South West, etc answered the poll. You can also see from the tables that the polls contain the right proportions of young people, old people and so on.

    7) There is a 3% margin of error, so if the two parties are within 3% of each other they are statistically in a dead heat

    No. If a poll shows one party on 46% and one party on 45% then it is impossible to be 95% confident (the confidence interval that the 3% margin of error is based upon) that the first party isn’t actually on 43%, but it is more likely than not that the party on 46% is ahead. The 3% margin of error doesn’t mean that any percentage with that plus or minus 3 point range is equally likely, 50% of the time the “real” figure will be within 1 point of the given figure.

    8 ) Polls always get it wrong

    In 1992 the pollsters did get it wrong, and most of them didn’t cover themselves in glory in 1997. However, lessons have been learnt and the companies themselves have changed. Most of the companies polling today did not even exist in 1992, and the methods they use are almost unrecognisable – in 1992 everyone used face-to-face polling and there was no political weighting or reallocation of don’t knows. Today polling is either done on the phone or using internet panels, and there are various different methods of political weighting, likelihood to vote filtering and re-allocation of don’t knows. In 2001 most of the pollsters performed well, in 2005 they were all within a couple of points of the actual result, in 2010 the pollsters overestimated Lib Dem support, but were very accurate on the gap between Conservative and Labour.

    9) Polls never ask about don’t knows or won’t votes

    Actually they always do. The newspapers publishing them may not report the figures, but they will always be available on the pollsters’ own website. Many companies (such as ICM and Populus) not only include don’t knows in their tables, but estimate how they would actually vote if there was an election tomorrow and include a proportion of them in their topline figures.

    Like

  21. Garry Bessant says:

    I am so glad to finally see this. This needs to be made as public as possible!! finally the BBC has been shown up. The people in the rUK and around the world need to see the nonsense they have been fed by the BBC. Thanks to you for posting this and it is on my Facebook!! Well done!!

    Liked by 2 people

  22. Extensive articles on the bias here…

    http://newsnetscotland.com/index.php/affairs-scotland/8932-the-dirty-dozen-the-case-against-bbc-scotland-part-1

    And here…

    http://newsnetscotland.com/index.php/affairs-scotland/9619-the-dirty-dozen-the-case-against-bbc-scotland-part-2

    And here is a film about the bias issue.

    THE BIGGER THE LIE – Media Bias in the Scottish Independence Referendum

    Liked by 2 people

  23. As a Yes voter in Glasgow I wish I could believe the polls are wrong. My Facebook newsfeed was full of Yes posts and optimism. Now, slowly, more and more people who weren’t posting anything are coming out saying they are sick of all the Yes on their FB newsfeed and are voting No. I’ve been guilty of posting loads of Yes related links and views on FB and now feel as though, rather than doing any good, it’s pushed people to No. Just like the Better Together campaign pushed me to Yes. As for the older generation, my mother is one of very few yes voting pensioners. The majority of her friends are no, purely because they believe the lies about pensions being at risk. This morning I received a leaflet from Scottish Labour which had photos of headlines “RBS and Llyods will quit Scotland”, “Oil industry says Salmond lied about North Sea reserves”, “Pension time bomb fear”. All of these scare stories were proved to be bogus, but with 2 days before referendum, and no access to the internet, OAPs will read this leaflet and believe it.

    Liked by 1 person

  24. We know the BBC is westminster ruin, they li e. They cheat .will go to any lengths. To manipulate the Scottish. Voters

    Liked by 1 person

  25. Paul in Okinawa says:

    this is of course a very unreliable indicator, but, i ran a little survey of friends and family on facebook. Upper-middle class, lower-middle class, and working-class. 23 for Independence, 5 against. and when i was back in Scotland in the summer, there was overwhelming support for Independence. I think these YOUGOV polls and others are truly biased toward No. We’ll soon find out.

    Liked by 1 person

  26. you say no vote posters have not been put up by the BBC just look at picture of the queen with the no vote next to her .Did she put it there her self.NO IT BLEW IN WITH THE WIND .

    Liked by 1 person

  27. Im no Nationalist.But the atmosphere in places like Glasgow is definatly Yes.you can feel change in the air.i have noticed in last few wks that bbc etc have stopped covering of yes and drowned out with pro union comments and images of Glasgow last weekend .i was there and i can tell you i havs never seen anything like this.i really do believe independence is coming and nothing can stop it.

    Liked by 1 person

  28. duncan mackay says:

    they will try to fix the result next ,social media against the mainstream propoganda

    Liked by 2 people

  29. The BBC is doing to Scotland what Fox does to Obama and the Democrats…….lies and fabrication!

    Liked by 1 person

  30. As a definate YES supporter from Kilmarnock, this article has definately made me realise there is great momentum for the yes campaign, I had started to doubt how much support they had with the news coverage etc…. I went with my husband and 2 children to Glasgow city centre on Sunday to see the support and from what I could see the yes side were definately more favourable…… Come on Scotland – lets show Westminster who is in charge – lets do it for us, our children, and future generations to come!! This is Our moment, Our time – lets vote YES and live in a fairer Scotland!!!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hack Journalist says:

      Louise – Kilmarnock is a wonderful little town and I know some amazing Kilmarnock people. It has been so sad to hear of the demise of Johnnie Walker, but the town still has a nice little printing firm. You have only the kindest regards from here in Dublin. I hope your two children are well, and look forward to being free Scots.

      Like

  31. What looks like a factual list of examples of the BBC’s actions of editorial bias: http://www.newsnetscotland.com/index.php/affairs-scotland/9719-the-dirty-dozen-the-case-against-bbc-scotland

    Liked by 1 person

  32. To all Scott a big congrats in advance yes all the way

    Liked by 1 person

  33. Call me paranoid ..but I think they are trying to hide the Yes support and diddle the polls so that when they somehow fix the vote to be No they can say that No were always more popular. I can’t wait to get my ‘x’ in the yes box …and you can be sure I’ll be using a pen.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hack Journalist says:

      Anonymous – If you are careful enough to read the date on that BBC report you will see that it is dated September 16. Three whole days after the unreported events on Saturday. It is only under huge public pressure that the BBC are actually giving the Scottish licence fee payers what they deserve. It was mighty good of them to report on this event though. Thanks for your comment.

      Like

  34. Concerned reader says:

    No exit polls, i understand. Odd, that.

    Liked by 2 people

  35. This is Britain – mass manipulation – I am proud to have been born in England but completely reject the notion that I am ‘British’ – that is a choice I do not make. Here in my adopted country (Ireland) the totalitarian mindset has swept through political institutions and now embraces both industry and civil service bureaucracy – so – the perfect triumvirate (very much male-dominated). If Scotland votes ‘Yes’ we may all breathe a sigh of relief – firstly for the people of Scotland and then for ourselves and the rest of the Western World – perhaps Scotland, like their (and our) Northern Neighbour Iceland, will pave the way to a simpler all-embracing society where people count first and foremost – ALL people – privilege counts for nothing and culture – as in who people are, what pursuits they follow and how they choose to express themselves – is a reflection of the totality of their nation’s rich diversity.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hack Journalist says:

      Michael Way – Excellently put.Totalitarian methods of control, in government and in the media, are very much part of our reality here in Ireland, as they are all over the world at the moment. What we are witnessing in Scotland at the moment, I agree, is a mass movement that is both self-consciously nationalistic and tired of big government. These are hopeful times.

      Liked by 1 person

  36. If only America and Canada would try breaking free from England. Start now.

    Like

  37. Reblogged this on Lorraine Cleaver and commented:
    “Now clear to outside observer that.. polls conducted by Unionists ought to be treated with suspicion”

    Like

  38. Reblogged this on Lovepreet Aulakh's blog and commented:
    Scottish polls

    Like

  39. I have had several posts removed and they weren’t abusive in fact I was pointing out that there was no need for profanitys on posts put up by both sides and the abusive no comments were being removed to make it look as if it was they yes voter,s were the only abusive ones and I was asking for it to stop as all it was doing was to give the media fodder again,st the yes voters.
    I also think the reason my post,s were remove was that I was pointing out that the aggressive behaviour was not unique to Scotland as my son was abused in a shop in London just because he was Scottish in a threatening way Ie being told they didn,t want Scottish …….. In there country so ……. Of back there.
    I,m sure you can fill in the blanks
    And hey presto they were removed I guess it was because they didn,t want people to know what was happening down there .

    Like

  40. wakeupbeforeitstoolate says:

    Reblogged this on Wake Up Before It's Too Late.

    Like

  41. wakeupbeforeitstoolate says:

    By conducting bias polls they are hoping and praying that people waver in their commitment and vote No to cluster with the ‘staus quo’ – they forget we’re not wee, and we’re not stupid…we’re seeing through their lies!! Here’s one voter voting #Yes tomorrow in the #IndyRef!

    Like

  42. John Travers says:

    think the general international consensus is that the BBC is a balanced and fair public broadcster which has given both sides of this debate a great deal of coverage

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hack Journalist says:

      John Travers – No broadcaster, in Britain or around the world is that naive. Thanks for you comment.

      Like

  43. “…and leads to the conclusion that more sinister dirty tricks are being played by those in power.”

    No s… Sherlock!

    Like

Trackbacks

  1. […] Switzerland of Europe where capital would be attracted if they are out of the UK and the EU. Why? Something Fishy in the Scottish Polls – Emerald News Network. Big guns of UK state fire in to back a Yes vote. Custom byline text: Former ambassador and naval […]

    Like

Have Your Say

Paul Cairney: Politics & Public Policy

Professor of Politics and Public Policy, University of Stirling

Yorkshire Devolution Movement

Unleashing Yorkshire's potential through devolution - http://yorkshiredevolution.co.uk/

Batman & Robinson

Nicky and Mike's world tour

Edinburgh Eye

Equality, cats, and tea.

Semi-Partisan Politics

A semi-biased commentary on British and American politics, culture and current affairs

Butterfly Rebellion

Reubalachd Dealan-dè Albann

Bella Caledonia

independence - self-determination - autonomy